Psychological Assessment Data Automation

Assessment reports in minutes, not hours.

I’m an aerospace engineer. I spend my working life making sure large datasets are correct, because in my field a wrong number isn’t an inconvenience, it’s a failure. AeroPoint Automation applies the same habits to assessment data — pulling results out of the reports and exports you already have, generating the reports your practice or firm actually sends, and handing back a clean dataset you keep. I handle the data; you manage the interpretation.

Start a conversation See what I do

Once it’s built, a batch that took an afternoon runs in a few minutes, and every value in it traces back to the report it came from. Building it takes a few weeks and access to your actual files.

8 Instruments with working, tested extraction built
1,921 Extracted values checked against the source report
Hours → Minutes Report generation, once the pipeline is built

These numbers come from one engagement — the only practice I’ve built a pipeline for so far. It’s a live system in daily use, not a demo, and it’s one client. You should hear that from me rather than find it out later.

About

Assessment data, handled like flight data.

I’m Sean Fennig, an aerospace engineer. In my engineering work I move and clean datasets far larger than anything an assessment practice will ever hand me. The difficulty here isn’t volume — it’s that every single value has to be right, and someone is currently typing them in by hand.

I don’t interpret results and I don’t advise on decisions. I handle the data around them, and that boundary isn’t reluctance — it’s the whole design of the service. Your professional judgment is the product; the transcription, formatting, and file wrangling around it shouldn’t be costing you evenings.

I’ve built and shipped one of these pipelines end to end for a psychological consulting practice. It replaced manual transcription from scored PDF reports with automated extraction and report assembly, and it’s still in daily use. I can’t say more about that client without their permission — if you’d like to speak to a reference, ask me and I’ll go and get one.

The work I’ve done so far is in selection and leadership development — Watson-Glaser, MBTI, Strong, CPI, and the like. The pipeline doesn’t much care what the instrument measures, but you should know where my hands-on experience actually is.

Worth saying plainly: AeroPoint is deliberately small. I run it alongside a full-time engineering job and take on a few projects at a time, on purpose. What you get for that is the person who actually built your pipeline answering your email, usually within a business day. I have a track record of fixing all found bugs within 24 hours and will personally manually generate reports if required. What you don’t get is a team of ten by next month — if that’s what your timeline needs, I’ll tell you on the first call.

What you can expect

  • Every extracted value traceable back to the page it came from, so you can spot-check it yourself.
  • Your existing reports rebuilt to match what you already send out, down to the wording and layout.
  • A small, deliberate book of work — I take a few projects at a time so the ones I have get answered fast.
  • An honest account of what I have and haven’t done before. Ask me directly and you’ll get a straight answer.

Before you send me anything

  • I sign an NDA before we exchange any files. If your counsel determines a Business Associate Agreement applies, I’ll work through it with them before any protected data moves — I’d rather scope the project so it never touches PHI in the first place.
  • Extraction is deterministic code, not a language model. Your data isn’t sent to any third-party AI service, and nothing you give me is used to train anything.
  • I’m a solo contractor, not a vendor with a security department behind me — no SOC 2 report, no compliance team. Ask me where your data would live, who else can see it, and what happens to it when the project ends. I’d rather answer that before you commit than after.

Services

Three things I do.

Each one stands on its own, and together they cover the whole path from raw instrument output to a finished report and a dataset worth keeping.

Data Extraction from Your Sources

Standard psychometric instruments, vendor exports, scanned forms, spreadsheets, and PDFs. Before I quote anything, I test extraction against your actual files — if a source won’t parse cleanly, I’ll tell you up front rather than after.

  • PDF and scanned-report parsing
  • Every extracted value compared against the source report
  • Re-tested and repaired when a publisher changes a format
  • Publisher agreements read together before any work starts

Professional & Custom Report Generation

Your report, your language, your formatting — produced automatically. Built around the batteries you actually run, or a fully custom template matched to exactly what your practice already sends out.

  • Batch generation, minutes not hours
  • Custom templates and branding
  • Repeatable output you can spot-check

Data Organization & Delivery

Already-scored output, cleaned and structured — then delivered the way you actually work. Per-participant files, a longitudinal table you can track over time, or a single dataset in a format your team already knows. I don’t score instruments and I don’t generate norms; I work from the output your publisher platform has already produced. Any aggregation across records happens only where you’ve confirmed you have the consent, contractual right, or other authority for it.

  • Clean, normalized data structures
  • Longitudinal views over time
  • Open formats — no lock-in

Instruments I’ve already built for

  • PSI Executive Battery
  • Watson-Glaser II & III Critical Thinking Appraisal
  • Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
  • FIRO-B
  • Strong Interest Inventory
  • California Psychological Inventory (CPI 260)
  • Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI)
  • EQ-i 2.0

Not on the list? Most report formats parse fine. Tell me the instrument and how you get the output — publisher portal, PDF download, CSV — and I’ll tell you within a business day whether it’s workable. Please don’t send a real report until we have an NDA and a secure way to move files; a redacted page or a blank sample is plenty to start.

Instrument and product names are trademarks of their publishers. AeroPoint Automation is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or licensed by any test publisher. Before any work starts I read your publisher agreement with you. If it doesn’t allow what you’re asking for, I’ll tell you and we stop there — I won’t guess on your behalf.

Contact

Let’s talk about your workflow.

I’d like to hear how your assessment process runs today — where the manual work still is, what your reports have to look like, and what you wish you had at the end of it. If I’m the right person to help, I’ll show you exactly how. If I’m not, I’ll tell you that just as directly.

Your message comes straight to me — there is no intake queue and no one else to route it through. I answer every email within one business day, and I’m glad to spend twenty minutes on a call before either of us commits to anything.

Please don’t include client or candidate names, records, or any confidential personal information here — a description of your workflow is plenty. I’ll set up secure file handling before anything sensitive moves. Prefer plain email? Write to Sean@AeroPointAutomation.com directly.